THIS WEEK'S STORY
How Much Should an S Corp Owner Actually Pay Themselves?
Carlos runs a foundation and concrete business down on the Peninsula. He came to me last fall after his longtime CPA retired.
First thing I pulled was his W-2. One hundred sixty-five thousand dollars ($165,000).
I asked how he landed on that number.
"My old guy told me to pay myself a real salary so the IRS leaves me alone."
So he did. Three years running.
Reasonable compensation is not the biggest number you can stomach. It is what you would pay somebody else to do your job.
So I asked Carlos what his job actually is. He does not pour concrete anymore. He estimates, he bids, he runs two crews, he handles the client calls. We priced each of those roles against wage data for his trade in his county. The number came in near one hundred twelve thousand dollars ($112,000).
He had been running fifty-three thousand dollars ($53,000) a year through payroll that belonged in distributions.
Both halves of payroll tax on that is roughly eight thousand dollars ($8,000) a year. Three years of it, and payroll tax is hard to claw back.
Now the other direction, because it is worse. In Watson v. United States, an owner paid himself twenty-four thousand dollars ($24,000) a year while taking distributions over two hundred thousand ($200,000). The court set his real wage at ninety-one thousand forty-four dollars ($91,044) and reclassified the difference as wages. He owed the back payroll tax, plus penalties and interest.
There is no formula. No sixty-forty rule, no percentage of profit. Anyone who quotes you one is guessing.
Here is how I set it.
- What would you pay a person to do each piece of your job?
- How many hours do you actually work in the business?
- What does that work pay in your county?
Answer those, then write the reasoning down and date it before payroll runs, not after a letter shows up.